Researchers are developing a new kind of geothermal power plant that
will lock away unwanted carbon dioxide (CO2) underground – and use it as
a tool to boost electric power generation by at least 10 times compared
to existing geothermal energy approaches.
The technology to implement this design already exists in different
industries, so the researchers are optimistic that their new approach
could expand the use of geothermal energy in the U.S. far beyond the
handful of states that can take advantage of it now.
At the American Geophysical Union meeting recently, the research team
debuted an expanded version of the design, along with a computer
animated movie that merges advances in science with design and cognitive
learning techniques to explain the role that energy technologies can
have in addressing climate change.
The new power plant design resembles a cross between a typical
geothermal power plant and the Large Hadron Collider: It features a
series of concentric rings of horizontal wells deep underground. Inside
those rings, CO2, nitrogen and water circulate separately to draw heat
from below ground up to the surface, where the heat can be used to turn
turbines and generate electricity.
Study co-author – Assistant Professor of Energy Policy in the
Department of Civil, Environmental, Jeffrey Bielicki and Geodetic
Engineering and the John Glenn School of Public Affairs at The Ohio
State University, explained: “Typical geothermal power plants tap into
hot water that is deep under ground, pull the heat off the hot water,
use that heat to generate electricity, and then return the cooler water
back to the deep subsurface. Here the water is partly replaced with CO2
or another fluid — or a combination of fluids”.
Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Earth Sciences at the
University of Minnesota, Jimmy Randolph, hinted that when we began to
develop the idea to use CO2 to produce geothermal energy, we wanted to
find a way to make CO2 storage cost-effective while expanding the use of
geothermal energy.
“We hope that we can expand the reach of geothermal energy in the
United States to include most states west of the Mississippi River,”
Bielicki said.
The current research team includes Ohio State, the University of
Minnesota and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where geoscientist
Tom Buscheck came up with the idea to add nitrogen to the mix.
He and his colleagues believe that the resulting multifluid design
will enable geothermal power plants to store energy away – perhaps
hundreds of gigawatt hours – for days or even months, so that it is
available when the electricity grid needs it. The underground geothermal
formation could store hot, pressurized CO2 and nitrogen, and release
the heat to the surface power plant when electricity demand is greatest.
The plant could also suspend heat extraction from the subsurface during
times of low power demand, or when there is already a surplus of
renewable power on the grid.
“What makes this concept transformational is that we can deliver
renewable energy to customers when it is needed, rather than when the
wind happens to be blowing, or when spring thaw causes the greatest
runoff,” Buscheck said.
In computer simulations, a 10-mile-wide system of concentric rings of
horizontal wells situated about three miles below ground produced as
much as half a gigawatt of electrical power – an amount comparable to a
medium-sized coal-fired power plant — and more than 10 times bigger than
the 38 megawatts produced by the average geothermal plant in the United
States.
The simulations also revealed that a plant of this design might
sequester as much as 15 million tons of CO2 per year, which is roughly
equivalent to the amount produced by three medium-sized coal-fired power
plants in that time.
Bielicki noted the possibility of expanding the use of geothermal
energy around the country. Right now, most geothermal power plants are
in California and Nevada, where very hot water is relatively close to
the surface. But the new design is so much more efficient at both
storing energy and extracting heat that even smaller-scale “hotspots”
throughout the western U.S. could generate power.
Buscheck added, however, that the study showed that this design could
work effectively with or without CO2, and said a pilot plant based on
this design could initially be powered solely by nitrogen injection to
prove the economic viability of using CO2. The research team is
currently working on more detailed computer model simulations and
economic analyses for specific geologic settings in the U.S.
“We built this concept of public outreach into our efforts not just
to communicate our work, but also to explore new ways for scientists,
engineers, economists and artists to work together,” Bielicki said.
Co-authors on the presentation also included Mingjie Chen, Yue Hao
and Yunwei Sun, all of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Work at
the University of Minnesota and Ohio State has been funded by the
National Science Foundation, while work at Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory has been funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment