The Enron debacle focused renewed attention on corporate governance
and organizational failures and successes. Since then a number of
studies have shown that there exists a nexus between positive
implementation of corporate governance and company performance with many
scholars connecting the outright failure of a good number of blue chip
organizations to lack of good corporate governance.
This failure, which translates into an inability of organisations to
meet expectations of their various stakeholders and investors have often
been traced to weaknesses in internal control, operating system, and a
lack of commitment to the highest ethical standards.
Corporate governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose.
It is concerned with the practices and procedures for trying to
ensure that a company is run in such a way that it achieves its
objectives.
The key consideration in corporate governance is that the company
must have an effective board of directors that is dedicated to ensuring
that the company achieves its objectives and the affairs of the company
must be carried on in such a manner as to ensure transparency,
accountability, and information dissemination for the overall benefit of
shareholders and other stakeholders.
It is also about running an organization in a way that guarantees
that its owners or shareholders receive a fair return on their
investment, while the expectations of other stakeholders are also met.
It addresses the need for organizational stewards or managers to act
in the best interest of the firm’s core stakeholders, particularly,
minority shareholders or investors, by ensuring that only actions that
facilitate delivery of optimum returns and other favorable outcomes are
taken at all times.
Modern corporate governance is universally recognized as a term that
refers to the manner in which companies, agencies and corporate bodies
are managed or directed by all functionaries entrusted with the duties
and responsibilities of directing or managing such organizations.
It also includes the manner in which duties, functions, rights and
responsibilities are apportioned, distributed or shared among the
shareholders, the directors and managers of a company.
In Nigeria, the basic statute which primarily sets the standards for
good corporate governance with respect to all companies is the
“Companies and Allied Matters Act CAP C20 LFN 2004”. However the
Investment and Securities Act ISA, Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)
Rules and Regulation and Code of Corporate Governance 2011 (for
compliance by quoted companies) can also be relied upon where
appropriate, to serve as a guide in setting the standards for corporate
governance in a private company although those legislations and rules
apply primarily to public company.
Seplat Petroleum Development Company Plc, a Nigerian oil and gas
independent which has recently transformed into a public company has
drawn fresh attention to issues of Corporate Governance with new
additions to its board.
The company has strengthened its board in a move that industry
watchers believe is a strategic one aimed at firing the company’s growth
aspirations and thus making SEPLAT a truly competitive global player
and investor’s choice.
Speaking at the company’s Extra-Ordinary General meeting which held
in Lagos on Monday January 27, 2014 the Chairman of SEPLAT ABC Orjiakor
noted that “SEPLAT has recorded phenomenal strides and continues to grow
exponentially.”
The chairman hinged that growth on a few key indices; “an adherence
to the company’s core values of Safety, Environment, Partnership,
Leadership, Accountability and Teamwork as well as strict compliance
with corporate governance best practices.”
Speaking further, Orjiako declared that “Corporate Governance and
Best Practices are therefore, the bed rock of our existence. They are
pivotal to the sustainability of our growth aspirations. In SEPLAT, we
not only comply with International Corporate policies and best
practices, we strive to remain best in class at all time. Consequently,
we are delighted that we have put in place for our company, a very
diverse and experienced Board, made up of people of high intellect and
outstanding integrity. We have now moved from a wholly Shareholder board
to a broad based board with strong Independent Non-executive
representation as well as Executive presence.”
As a public company, SEPLAT’s operations would now be under greater
regulatory and public scrutiny. In addition it would have to comply with
the listing and post listing requirements of the Nigerian Stock
Exchange and those of every market where it is listed.
To ensure that the company continues on the path of growth and
compliance, the board has been enlarged to accommodate petroleum
industry heavyweight and former Chairman of Shell Companies in Nigeria,
Basil Omiyi (Non-Executive Director), Former head of the Federal Inland
Revenue Service, Ifueko Omogui-Okaro, Non-Executive;
Brito, Michael Alexander (Non-Executive Director), Stuart Connal and
academic, Charles Okeahalam. Stuart Connal, former CEO of Centrica,
joined SEPLAT as COO and has now been promoted to the board as an
Executive Director.
The diverse nature of the board is expected to reflect SEPLAT’s focus
on maintaining and adhering to best Corporate Governance principles as
an indigenous company with world class aspirations.
The board membership showcases abundant knowledge and
multi-disciplinary experience which is expected to help SEPLAT remain
best in class in Corporate Governance, Management and regulatory
paradigms within the Nigerian E&P ecosystem.
The full composition of the board according to the SEPLAT website is
now: ABC Orjiako, Austin Avuru, Macaulay Ofurhie, Jean-Francois Henin,
Michel Hochard, Nasir Ado Bayero, Basil Omiyi Ifueko Omogui-Okaro,
Michael Alexander, Stuart Connal and Dr. Charles Okeahalam.
Writing in the Academy of Management Review, Amy J. Hillman and
Thomas Dalziel have noted in their article “Boards of Directors and Firm
Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives”
that Researchers seeking evidence of links between boards of directors
and firm performance commonly follow one of two distinct paths. The most
dominant path is that of agency theorists who contend that a key
activity for boards is monitoring management on behalf of shareholders
and that effective monitoring can improve firm performance by reducing
agency costs. The second, relatively less explored, path researchers
take to study boards and firm performance is based in resource
dependence theory.
Of primary concern in this research tradition is what we refer to as
board capital. This capital consists of both human capital (experience,
expertise, reputation) and relational capital (network of ties to other
firms and external contingencies). Resource dependence theorists examine
how board capital leads to the provision of resources to the firm.
Empirical studies in the resource dependence tradition have shown a
relationship between board capital and firm performance.”
Following from Amy J. Hillman and Thomas Dalziel findings, the
assumption is that these men and women will help the SEPLAT remain as
Orjiako has promised, that “we not only comply with International
Corporate policies and best practices, we strive to remain best in class
at all times.”
No comments:
Post a Comment